Same goes for many other things, why is sd holo meta, but not conversion holo? both are 2 meta builds aiming for different purposes (sd holo against power dmg and better teamfight abilities, conversion holo against mass condi dmg and bunkering), and why is blood scourge in the same row as curse scourge? Curse Scourge is clearly superior in every choice except if you dont a supporter, which you will always have in an AT. The builds are really bad there and the rankings are even worse, like why is POWER SHIRO listed as a t3 build? are you telling me its worse than core warrior, dp thief, hammer spellbreaker and fucking power shatter? how can anyone approve of this ranking is beyond me NEVER EVER take metabattle as source for ANY spvp meta related things, just dont If I am running core thief which is listed as "great" and enemy Mirage comes to contest my home point, all I can do is run and give it up, while Rev has a good chance of winning that fight but it's somehow "outside of meta". Also has lower skill floor than thief, permanent swiftness, might and fury for you and your team, high burst, unblockable attacks, stunbreaks, survivability and mobility. Now this build is actually good, and does well in current meta. It's not a bad build per se, a thief main player can certainly do better with it than me or someone looking to get into pvp, but I don't think that's worthy of 90+ rating.Īnother example is underestimating Power Shiro Revenant. If you read the lengthy negative review on it's frontpage it describes really well why this is not good anymore, while you still have plenty of good reviews overrating this build. Either some things become outdated, or simply not rated realistically.įor example it has core sw/d thief listed as great, but that's not really the case in the current meta anymore. It's not a 100% representation of how things truly are. I still use it myself but got burned on it a few times in the past, so take it with a grain of salt. ![]() In general it's a good starting point, but the ratings are really mixed and they don't give the best representation. Market capitalization (or market value) is the most commonly used method of measuring the. I mean it's pretty great but don't take it as black&white. Meta Platforms market cap history and chart from 2010 to 2022. Charts in the trading platform visualize changes of financial symbol quotes over time. No cash balance or cash flow is included in the calculation.Metabattle is not the best source. Please note all regulatory considerations regarding the presentation of fees must be taken into account. Backtested results are adjusted to reflect the reinvestment of dividends and other income and, except where otherwise indicated, are presented gross-of fees and do not include the effect of backtested transaction costs, management fees, performance fees or expenses, if applicable. Actual performance may differ significantly from backtested performance. Further, backtesting allows the security selection methodology to be adjusted until past returns are maximized. Since trades have not actually been executed, results may have under- or over-compensated for the impact, if any, of certain market factors, such as lack of liquidity, and may not reflect the impact that certain economic or market factors may have had on the decision-making process. Specifically, backtested results do not reflect actual trading or the effect of material economic and market factors on the decision-making process. Backtested performance is developed with the benefit of hindsight and has inherent limitations. This information is provided for illustrative purposes only. No representations and warranties are made as to the reasonableness of the assumptions. Certain assumptions have been made for modeling purposes and are unlikely to be realized. Changes in these assumptions may have a material impact on the backtested returns presented. General assumptions include: XYZ firm would have been able to purchase the securities recommended by the model and the markets were sufficiently liquid to permit all trading. Backtested results are calculated by the retroactive application of a model constructed on the basis of historical data and based on assumptions integral to the model which may or may not be testable and are subject to losses. ![]() The results reflect performance of a strategy not historically offered to investors and does not represent returns that any investor actually attained. ![]() Backtested performance is not an indicator of future actual results. Disclaimer: The TipRanks Smart Score performance is based on backtested results.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |